© 2011-2019 by Zack Smith. All rights reserved.
This is where the present claims are assumed to be true because of the origin of a person, group, or thing. That origin is however in most cases largely or completely irrelevant to the matter at hand and cannot be used as a basis for determining the truth of the present proposition.
- Proposition A asserts something about Person or Object A.
- Person or Object A has an ancestor or origin X.
- Therefore it is argued that Proposition A is true. ]]
This is an example of offering up irrelevant evidence or flimsy evidence to support a desired claim.
Dogs are essentially blood thirsty beasts, because they're descended from wolves after all.
The Johnsons are descended from people were always scamming our ancestors, so of course we can't trust them.
My parents always brought me up to believe that there is a god, therefore today I assert there is a god. [Self-origin.]
The Genetic fallacy is basically a tactic to cast a present claim as true without going through the trouble of actual debate, analysis, or fact-finding, probably because the present claim is weak, unsupported, or simply bogus.
You should point out that the long-ago origin or characteristic has no bearing on the present discussion, and demand that they prove that it does. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs...
You can draw attention to the likelihood that the long-ago proposition...